D20, No Liquids 3: 'A Confession: If Au Bon Pain had left over French Onion Soup tonight I'd have had a cup. Why? Mental relief. The Life of a cup of soup.
I DON'T WANT TO DIE. BUT 200 BILLION TIMES MORE THAN THAT, I WANT OUR CHILDREN TO LIVE, AND IF SOMETHING, SOMEONE(S) DON'T AWAKEN OUR COLD, DEAD, GODLESS SOULS, OUR KIDS HAVE NOTHING BUT EARTH-HELL AHEAD OF THEM, FOR THE NEXT 1000 GENERATIONS.
Oh, they were out of the soup.
I'm glad.'
Loving
4.17.2013
nd D20, No Liquids 3: 'A Confession: If Au Bon Pain had left over French Onion Soup tonight I'd have had a cup. Why? Mental relief. The Life of a cup of soup. I DON'T WANT TO DIE. BUT 200 BILLION TIMES MORE THAN THAT, I WANT OUR CHILDREN TO LIVE, AND IF SOMETHING, SOMEONE(S) DON'T AWAKEN OUR COLD, DEAD, GODLESS SOULS, OUR KIDS HAVE NOTHING BUT EARTH-HELL AHEAD OF THEM. Oh, they were out of the soup. I'm glad.' Loving
Stockholm U: Sir Nicholas Stern: Meeting the climate challenge
Guardian 01.26.13:
Nicholas Stern: 'I got it wrong on climate change – it's far, far worse'
Author of 2006 review speaks out on danger to economies as planet absorbs less carbon and is 'on track' for 4C rise
>>>>>>>
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/jan/27/nicholas-stern-climate-change-davos
<<<<<<<
------------
Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stern_Review
The Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change is a 700-page report released for the British government on 30 October 2006 by economist Nicholas Stern, chair of the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment at the London School of Economics and also chair of the Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy (CCCEP) at Leeds University and LSE. The report discusses the effect of global warming on the world economy. Although not the first economic report on climate change, it is significant as the largest and most widely known and discussed report of its kind.[1]
The Review states that climate change is the greatest and widest-ranging market failure ever seen, presenting a unique challenge for economics.[2] The Review provides prescriptions including environmental taxes to minimise the economic and social disruptions. The Stern Review's main conclusion is that the benefits of strong, early action on climate change far outweigh the costs of not acting.[3] The Review points to the potential impacts of climate change on water resources, food production, health, and the environment[clarification needed]. According to the Review, without action, the overall costs of climate change will be equivalent to losing at least 5% of global gross domestic product (GDP) each year, now and forever. Including a wider range of risks and impacts could increase this to 20% of GDP or more, also indefinitely. Stern believes that 5-6 degrees of temperature increase is "a real possibility."[4]
The Review proposes that one percent of global GDP per annum is required to be invested in order to avoid the worst effects of climate change. In June 2008, Stern increased the estimate for the annual cost of achieving stabilisation between 500 and 550 ppm CO2e to 2% of GDP to account for faster than expected climate change.[5]...
Nicholas Stern: 'I got it wrong on climate change – it's far, far worse'
Author of 2006 review speaks out on danger to economies as planet absorbs less carbon and is 'on track' for 4C rise
>>>>>>>
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/jan/27/nicholas-stern-climate-change-davos
<<<<<<<
------------
Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stern_Review
The Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change is a 700-page report released for the British government on 30 October 2006 by economist Nicholas Stern, chair of the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment at the London School of Economics and also chair of the Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy (CCCEP) at Leeds University and LSE. The report discusses the effect of global warming on the world economy. Although not the first economic report on climate change, it is significant as the largest and most widely known and discussed report of its kind.[1]
The Review states that climate change is the greatest and widest-ranging market failure ever seen, presenting a unique challenge for economics.[2] The Review provides prescriptions including environmental taxes to minimise the economic and social disruptions. The Stern Review's main conclusion is that the benefits of strong, early action on climate change far outweigh the costs of not acting.[3] The Review points to the potential impacts of climate change on water resources, food production, health, and the environment[clarification needed]. According to the Review, without action, the overall costs of climate change will be equivalent to losing at least 5% of global gross domestic product (GDP) each year, now and forever. Including a wider range of risks and impacts could increase this to 20% of GDP or more, also indefinitely. Stern believes that 5-6 degrees of temperature increase is "a real possibility."[4]
The Review proposes that one percent of global GDP per annum is required to be invested in order to avoid the worst effects of climate change. In June 2008, Stern increased the estimate for the annual cost of achieving stabilisation between 500 and 550 ppm CO2e to 2% of GDP to account for faster than expected climate change.[5]...
Columbia U: A Conversation with Lord Nicholas Stern
Guardian 01.26.13:
Nicholas Stern: 'I got it wrong on climate change – it's far, far worse'
Author of 2006 review speaks out on danger to economies as planet absorbs less carbon and is 'on track' for 4C rise
>>>>>>>
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/jan/27/nicholas-stern-climate-change-davos
<<<<<<<
------------
Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stern_Review
The Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change is a 700-page report released for the British government on 30 October 2006 by economist Nicholas Stern, chair of the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment at the London School of Economics and also chair of the Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy (CCCEP) at Leeds University and LSE. The report discusses the effect of global warming on the world economy. Although not the first economic report on climate change, it is significant as the largest and most widely known and discussed report of its kind.[1]
The Review states that climate change is the greatest and widest-ranging market failure ever seen, presenting a unique challenge for economics.[2] The Review provides prescriptions including environmental taxes to minimise the economic and social disruptions. The Stern Review's main conclusion is that the benefits of strong, early action on climate change far outweigh the costs of not acting.[3] The Review points to the potential impacts of climate change on water resources, food production, health, and the environment[clarification needed]. According to the Review, without action, the overall costs of climate change will be equivalent to losing at least 5% of global gross domestic product (GDP) each year, now and forever. Including a wider range of risks and impacts could increase this to 20% of GDP or more, also indefinitely. Stern believes that 5-6 degrees of temperature increase is "a real possibility."[4]
The Review proposes that one percent of global GDP per annum is required to be invested in order to avoid the worst effects of climate change. In June 2008, Stern increased the estimate for the annual cost of achieving stabilisation between 500 and 550 ppm CO2e to 2% of GDP to account for faster than expected climate change.[5]...
Nicholas Stern: 'I got it wrong on climate change – it's far, far worse'
Author of 2006 review speaks out on danger to economies as planet absorbs less carbon and is 'on track' for 4C rise
>>>>>>>
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/jan/27/nicholas-stern-climate-change-davos
<<<<<<<
------------
Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stern_Review
The Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change is a 700-page report released for the British government on 30 October 2006 by economist Nicholas Stern, chair of the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment at the London School of Economics and also chair of the Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy (CCCEP) at Leeds University and LSE. The report discusses the effect of global warming on the world economy. Although not the first economic report on climate change, it is significant as the largest and most widely known and discussed report of its kind.[1]
The Review states that climate change is the greatest and widest-ranging market failure ever seen, presenting a unique challenge for economics.[2] The Review provides prescriptions including environmental taxes to minimise the economic and social disruptions. The Stern Review's main conclusion is that the benefits of strong, early action on climate change far outweigh the costs of not acting.[3] The Review points to the potential impacts of climate change on water resources, food production, health, and the environment[clarification needed]. According to the Review, without action, the overall costs of climate change will be equivalent to losing at least 5% of global gross domestic product (GDP) each year, now and forever. Including a wider range of risks and impacts could increase this to 20% of GDP or more, also indefinitely. Stern believes that 5-6 degrees of temperature increase is "a real possibility."[4]
The Review proposes that one percent of global GDP per annum is required to be invested in order to avoid the worst effects of climate change. In June 2008, Stern increased the estimate for the annual cost of achieving stabilisation between 500 and 550 ppm CO2e to 2% of GDP to account for faster than expected climate change.[5]...
Tufts U: Nicholas Stern on the new economics of climate change
Guardian 01.26.13:
Nicholas Stern: 'I got it wrong on climate change – it's far, far worse'
Author of 2006 review speaks out on danger to economies as planet absorbs less carbon and is 'on track' for 4C rise
>>>>>>>
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/jan/27/nicholas-stern-climate-change-davos
<<<<<<<
------------
Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stern_Review
The Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change is a 700-page report released for the British government on 30 October 2006 by economist Nicholas Stern, chair of the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment at the London School of Economics and also chair of the Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy (CCCEP) at Leeds University and LSE. The report discusses the effect of global warming on the world economy. Although not the first economic report on climate change, it is significant as the largest and most widely known and discussed report of its kind.[1]
The Review states that climate change is the greatest and widest-ranging market failure ever seen, presenting a unique challenge for economics.[2] The Review provides prescriptions including environmental taxes to minimise the economic and social disruptions. The Stern Review's main conclusion is that the benefits of strong, early action on climate change far outweigh the costs of not acting.[3] The Review points to the potential impacts of climate change on water resources, food production, health, and the environment[clarification needed]. According to the Review, without action, the overall costs of climate change will be equivalent to losing at least 5% of global gross domestic product (GDP) each year, now and forever. Including a wider range of risks and impacts could increase this to 20% of GDP or more, also indefinitely. Stern believes that 5-6 degrees of temperature increase is "a real possibility."[4]
The Review proposes that one percent of global GDP per annum is required to be invested in order to avoid the worst effects of climate change. In June 2008, Stern increased the estimate for the annual cost of achieving stabilisation between 500 and 550 ppm CO2e to 2% of GDP to account for faster than expected climate change.[5]...
Nicholas Stern: 'I got it wrong on climate change – it's far, far worse'
Author of 2006 review speaks out on danger to economies as planet absorbs less carbon and is 'on track' for 4C rise
>>>>>>>
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/jan/27/nicholas-stern-climate-change-davos
<<<<<<<
------------
Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stern_Review
The Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change is a 700-page report released for the British government on 30 October 2006 by economist Nicholas Stern, chair of the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment at the London School of Economics and also chair of the Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy (CCCEP) at Leeds University and LSE. The report discusses the effect of global warming on the world economy. Although not the first economic report on climate change, it is significant as the largest and most widely known and discussed report of its kind.[1]
The Review states that climate change is the greatest and widest-ranging market failure ever seen, presenting a unique challenge for economics.[2] The Review provides prescriptions including environmental taxes to minimise the economic and social disruptions. The Stern Review's main conclusion is that the benefits of strong, early action on climate change far outweigh the costs of not acting.[3] The Review points to the potential impacts of climate change on water resources, food production, health, and the environment[clarification needed]. According to the Review, without action, the overall costs of climate change will be equivalent to losing at least 5% of global gross domestic product (GDP) each year, now and forever. Including a wider range of risks and impacts could increase this to 20% of GDP or more, also indefinitely. Stern believes that 5-6 degrees of temperature increase is "a real possibility."[4]
The Review proposes that one percent of global GDP per annum is required to be invested in order to avoid the worst effects of climate change. In June 2008, Stern increased the estimate for the annual cost of achieving stabilisation between 500 and 550 ppm CO2e to 2% of GDP to account for faster than expected climate change.[5]...
Nicholas Stern "The Global Deal"
Guardian 01.26.13:
Nicholas Stern: 'I got it wrong on climate change – it's far, far worse'
Author of 2006 review speaks out on danger to economies as planet absorbs less carbon and is 'on track' for 4C rise
>>>>>>>
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/jan/27/nicholas-stern-climate-change-davos
<<<<<<<
------------
Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stern_Review
The Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change is a 700-page report released for the British government on 30 October 2006 by economist Nicholas Stern, chair of the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment at the London School of Economics and also chair of the Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy (CCCEP) at Leeds University and LSE. The report discusses the effect of global warming on the world economy. Although not the first economic report on climate change, it is significant as the largest and most widely known and discussed report of its kind.[1]
The Review states that climate change is the greatest and widest-ranging market failure ever seen, presenting a unique challenge for economics.[2] The Review provides prescriptions including environmental taxes to minimise the economic and social disruptions. The Stern Review's main conclusion is that the benefits of strong, early action on climate change far outweigh the costs of not acting.[3] The Review points to the potential impacts of climate change on water resources, food production, health, and the environment[clarification needed]. According to the Review, without action, the overall costs of climate change will be equivalent to losing at least 5% of global gross domestic product (GDP) each year, now and forever. Including a wider range of risks and impacts could increase this to 20% of GDP or more, also indefinitely. Stern believes that 5-6 degrees of temperature increase is "a real possibility."[4]
The Review proposes that one percent of global GDP per annum is required to be invested in order to avoid the worst effects of climate change. In June 2008, Stern increased the estimate for the annual cost of achieving stabilisation between 500 and 550 ppm CO2e to 2% of GDP to account for faster than expected climate change.[5]...
Nicholas Stern: 'I got it wrong on climate change – it's far, far worse'
Author of 2006 review speaks out on danger to economies as planet absorbs less carbon and is 'on track' for 4C rise
>>>>>>>
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/jan/27/nicholas-stern-climate-change-davos
<<<<<<<
------------
Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stern_Review
The Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change is a 700-page report released for the British government on 30 October 2006 by economist Nicholas Stern, chair of the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment at the London School of Economics and also chair of the Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy (CCCEP) at Leeds University and LSE. The report discusses the effect of global warming on the world economy. Although not the first economic report on climate change, it is significant as the largest and most widely known and discussed report of its kind.[1]
The Review states that climate change is the greatest and widest-ranging market failure ever seen, presenting a unique challenge for economics.[2] The Review provides prescriptions including environmental taxes to minimise the economic and social disruptions. The Stern Review's main conclusion is that the benefits of strong, early action on climate change far outweigh the costs of not acting.[3] The Review points to the potential impacts of climate change on water resources, food production, health, and the environment[clarification needed]. According to the Review, without action, the overall costs of climate change will be equivalent to losing at least 5% of global gross domestic product (GDP) each year, now and forever. Including a wider range of risks and impacts could increase this to 20% of GDP or more, also indefinitely. Stern believes that 5-6 degrees of temperature increase is "a real possibility."[4]
The Review proposes that one percent of global GDP per annum is required to be invested in order to avoid the worst effects of climate change. In June 2008, Stern increased the estimate for the annual cost of achieving stabilisation between 500 and 550 ppm CO2e to 2% of GDP to account for faster than expected climate change.[5]...
Princeton U, Nicholas Stern: The Economics of Climate Change: Risk, Ethics, a Global Deal
Guardian 01.26.13:
Nicholas Stern: 'I got it wrong on climate change – it's far, far worse'
Author of 2006 review speaks out on danger to economies as planet absorbs less carbon and is 'on track' for 4C rise
>>>>>>>
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/jan/27/nicholas-stern-climate-change-davos
<<<<<<<
------------
Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stern_Review
The Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change is a 700-page report released for the British government on 30 October 2006 by economist Nicholas Stern, chair of the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment at the London School of Economics and also chair of the Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy (CCCEP) at Leeds University and LSE. The report discusses the effect of global warming on the world economy. Although not the first economic report on climate change, it is significant as the largest and most widely known and discussed report of its kind.[1]
The Review states that climate change is the greatest and widest-ranging market failure ever seen, presenting a unique challenge for economics.[2] The Review provides prescriptions including environmental taxes to minimise the economic and social disruptions. The Stern Review's main conclusion is that the benefits of strong, early action on climate change far outweigh the costs of not acting.[3] The Review points to the potential impacts of climate change on water resources, food production, health, and the environment[clarification needed]. According to the Review, without action, the overall costs of climate change will be equivalent to losing at least 5% of global gross domestic product (GDP) each year, now and forever. Including a wider range of risks and impacts could increase this to 20% of GDP or more, also indefinitely. Stern believes that 5-6 degrees of temperature increase is "a real possibility."[4]
The Review proposes that one percent of global GDP per annum is required to be invested in order to avoid the worst effects of climate change. In June 2008, Stern increased the estimate for the annual cost of achieving stabilisation between 500 and 550 ppm CO2e to 2% of GDP to account for faster than expected climate change.[5]...
Nicholas Stern: 'I got it wrong on climate change – it's far, far worse'
Author of 2006 review speaks out on danger to economies as planet absorbs less carbon and is 'on track' for 4C rise
>>>>>>>
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/jan/27/nicholas-stern-climate-change-davos
<<<<<<<
------------
Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stern_Review
The Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change is a 700-page report released for the British government on 30 October 2006 by economist Nicholas Stern, chair of the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment at the London School of Economics and also chair of the Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy (CCCEP) at Leeds University and LSE. The report discusses the effect of global warming on the world economy. Although not the first economic report on climate change, it is significant as the largest and most widely known and discussed report of its kind.[1]
The Review states that climate change is the greatest and widest-ranging market failure ever seen, presenting a unique challenge for economics.[2] The Review provides prescriptions including environmental taxes to minimise the economic and social disruptions. The Stern Review's main conclusion is that the benefits of strong, early action on climate change far outweigh the costs of not acting.[3] The Review points to the potential impacts of climate change on water resources, food production, health, and the environment[clarification needed]. According to the Review, without action, the overall costs of climate change will be equivalent to losing at least 5% of global gross domestic product (GDP) each year, now and forever. Including a wider range of risks and impacts could increase this to 20% of GDP or more, also indefinitely. Stern believes that 5-6 degrees of temperature increase is "a real possibility."[4]
The Review proposes that one percent of global GDP per annum is required to be invested in order to avoid the worst effects of climate change. In June 2008, Stern increased the estimate for the annual cost of achieving stabilisation between 500 and 550 ppm CO2e to 2% of GDP to account for faster than expected climate change.[5]...
vid TED Talk Tim Jackson Economics Of Climate Change
Guardian 01.26.13:
Nicholas Stern: 'I got it wrong on climate change – it's far, far worse'
Author of 2006 review speaks out on danger to economies as planet absorbs less carbon and is 'on track' for 4C rise
>>>>>>>
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/jan/27/nicholas-stern-climate-change-davos
<<<<<<<
------------
Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stern_Review
The Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change is a 700-page report released for the British government on 30 October 2006 by economist Nicholas Stern, chair of the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment at the London School of Economics and also chair of the Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy (CCCEP) at Leeds University and LSE. The report discusses the effect of global warming on the world economy. Although not the first economic report on climate change, it is significant as the largest and most widely known and discussed report of its kind.[1]
The Review states that climate change is the greatest and widest-ranging market failure ever seen, presenting a unique challenge for economics.[2] The Review provides prescriptions including environmental taxes to minimise the economic and social disruptions. The Stern Review's main conclusion is that the benefits of strong, early action on climate change far outweigh the costs of not acting.[3] The Review points to the potential impacts of climate change on water resources, food production, health, and the environment[clarification needed]. According to the Review, without action, the overall costs of climate change will be equivalent to losing at least 5% of global gross domestic product (GDP) each year, now and forever. Including a wider range of risks and impacts could increase this to 20% of GDP or more, also indefinitely. Stern believes that 5-6 degrees of temperature increase is "a real possibility."[4]
The Review proposes that one percent of global GDP per annum is required to be invested in order to avoid the worst effects of climate change. In June 2008, Stern increased the estimate for the annual cost of achieving stabilisation between 500 and 550 ppm CO2e to 2% of GDP to account for faster than expected climate change.[5]...
Nicholas Stern: 'I got it wrong on climate change – it's far, far worse'
Author of 2006 review speaks out on danger to economies as planet absorbs less carbon and is 'on track' for 4C rise
>>>>>>>
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/jan/27/nicholas-stern-climate-change-davos
<<<<<<<
------------
Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stern_Review
The Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change is a 700-page report released for the British government on 30 October 2006 by economist Nicholas Stern, chair of the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment at the London School of Economics and also chair of the Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy (CCCEP) at Leeds University and LSE. The report discusses the effect of global warming on the world economy. Although not the first economic report on climate change, it is significant as the largest and most widely known and discussed report of its kind.[1]
The Review states that climate change is the greatest and widest-ranging market failure ever seen, presenting a unique challenge for economics.[2] The Review provides prescriptions including environmental taxes to minimise the economic and social disruptions. The Stern Review's main conclusion is that the benefits of strong, early action on climate change far outweigh the costs of not acting.[3] The Review points to the potential impacts of climate change on water resources, food production, health, and the environment[clarification needed]. According to the Review, without action, the overall costs of climate change will be equivalent to losing at least 5% of global gross domestic product (GDP) each year, now and forever. Including a wider range of risks and impacts could increase this to 20% of GDP or more, also indefinitely. Stern believes that 5-6 degrees of temperature increase is "a real possibility."[4]
The Review proposes that one percent of global GDP per annum is required to be invested in order to avoid the worst effects of climate change. In June 2008, Stern increased the estimate for the annual cost of achieving stabilisation between 500 and 550 ppm CO2e to 2% of GDP to account for faster than expected climate change.[5]...
D20, Zero Fluids D3: 'Urine flow all but stopped; what comes is color of molasses; work 2 hours sleep an hour.... Fading fast now.' Loving
D20, Zero Fluids D3: 'Urine flow all but stopped; what comes is color of molasses; work 2 hours sleep an hour.... Fading fast now.' Loving
***** ND. ' THE GREATEST LESSON I'VE LEARNED IN 10 YEARS OF UNVIOLENT WARFARE: THE PROPER TARGET IS THE SOUL, TO AWAKEN, AND MOVE THE VERY SOUL, THE VERY CORE OF THE SIDELINE SITTING ONLOOKERS. ALL HOPE, ALL HOPE, ALL HOPE IS HERE. IT IS THE WORLD'S MOST POWERFUL TARGET. GANDHI'S SOUL FORCE. EVERYTHING LESS, EVERYTHING ELSE IS TOO LITTLE, TOO LATE NOW.' Loving
***** ND. ' THE GREATEST LESSON I'VE LEARNED IN 10 YEARS OF UNVIOLENT WARFARE: THE PROPER TARGET IS THE SOUL, TO AWAKEN, AND MOVE THE VERY SOUL, THE VERY CORE OF THE SIDELINE SITTING ONLOOKERS. ALL HOPE, ALL HOPE, ALL HOPE IS HERE. IT IS THE WORLD'S MOST POWERFUL TARGET. GANDHI'S SOUL FORCE. EVERYTHING LESS, EVERYTHING ELSE IS TOO LITTLE, TOO LATE NOW.' Loving
nd Day 20 Fast, Day 3 no Fluids: "GIVE YOUR BODY, GIVE YOUR VERY BLOOD FOR THE NEXT 200 BILLION CHILDREN. DO THIS IN REMEMBRANCE OF ME." Loving
nd Day 20 Fast, Day 3 no Fluids: "GIVE YOUR BODY, GIVE YOUR VERY BLOOD FOR THE NEXT 200 BILLION CHILDREN. DO THIS IN REMEMBRANCE OF ME." Loving
HELP ME HELP YOU!!!!! THIS DIES WITH ME, Unless you act, TODAY, NOW. PLEASEEEEEEEEEE.
This is the only Library, University, of Unviolent Revolution - Agape - Universal Family... in existence. http://thepiratebay.se/user/UnviolentPeacemaker/
UNLESS YOU KEEP IT ALIVE, NOW, TODAY, IT DIES WITH ME.
The way this works, unless people download, and keep on their system, the "Seeds" die, forever.
PLEASE!!!!! GO TO THIS SITE http://thepiratebay.se/user/UnviolentPeacemaker/ , NOW. Every Single entry with 0 or 1 seeds - DOWNLOAD IT!
I'm FADING VERY VERY FAST NOW - Day 20 no calories, Day 3 Zero Liquids. I am the one keeping the "0" and "1" alive. Unless YOU adopt them, they die with me, in coming days.
DON'T LET THIS HAPPEN!!!!
Don't know how? FIGURE IT OUT.
UNLESS YOU KEEP IT ALIVE, NOW, TODAY, IT DIES WITH ME.
The way this works, unless people download, and keep on their system, the "Seeds" die, forever.
PLEASE!!!!! GO TO THIS SITE http://thepiratebay.se/user/UnviolentPeacemaker/ , NOW. Every Single entry with 0 or 1 seeds - DOWNLOAD IT!
I'm FADING VERY VERY FAST NOW - Day 20 no calories, Day 3 Zero Liquids. I am the one keeping the "0" and "1" alive. Unless YOU adopt them, they die with me, in coming days.
DON'T LET THIS HAPPEN!!!!
Don't know how? FIGURE IT OUT.
Day 20, Day 3 zero Liquids: 'I'm fading very, very fast. Energy level 50%. Ill. Difficult to concentrate. DAMN!' Loving
Day 20, Day 3 zero Liquids: 'I'm fading very, very fast. Energy level 50%. Ill. Difficult to concentrate. DAMN!' Loving
Clean energy progress too slow to limit global warming, warns IEA. The Guardian
4.16.2013
nd 'Death Fast: Western Counterpart to the Ultimate Unviolent Weapon in the East - Self Immolation. Self-Immolation was instrumental to ending the Vietnam War - literally bringing MLK Jr. into opposition. Photos on the Kennedy desks.' Loving' Loving
nd 'Death Fast: Western Counterpart to the Ultimate Unviolent Weapon in the East - Self Immolation. Self-Immolation was instrumental to ending the Vietnam War - literally bringing MLK Jr. into opposition. Photos on the Kennedy desks.' Loving' Loving
nd 'Partnership: Synonym for Solidarity.' Loving
nd 'Partnership: Synonym for Solidarity, Loving, Serving from the Soul, Brotherhood, Universal Family.' Loving
nd 'A World-Class Farmer can Know that if crops can come up, she's the one to do it. But if given dead ground, solid rock, she can't know she'll succeed. Me too. If American's Soul is to be awakened, I'm doing my part, the right way. But is American's Souls too dead, beyond Redemption? Probably, but as long as there is a Prayer, it is worth my life.' Loving
nd 'A World-Class Farmer can Know that if crops can come up, she's the one to do it. But if given dead ground, solid rock, she can't know she'll succeed. Me too. If American's Soul is to be awakened, I'm doing my part, the right way. But is American's Souls too dead, beyond Redemption? Probably, but as long as there is a Prayer, it is worth my life.' Loving
4.15.2013
nd EDF Day 18 10pm: DANG! I'd hope for an all-nighter, but my avatar is too far gone. I'm operating as tho the next hour is when my avatar goes disfunctional, for good, so I priroitize. Tomorrow could be my last. I wanted to go all night. But I'm too far gone already. So much to do. Outa time.' Loving
nd EDF Day 18 10pm: DANG! I'd hope for an all-nighter, but my avatar is too far gone - ill, weak, exhausted, sick.... I'm operating as tho the next hour is when my avatar goes dysfunctional, for good, so I prioritize. Tomorrow could be my last. I wanted to go all night. But I'm too far gone already. So much to do. Outa time.' Loving
Ecocide's Death Fast Day 18:YOU have a duty, now. My avatar is degrading rapidly now. YOU have a Duty in my final days and hours (detail)
You have a duty, a moral responsibility to witness who I am and what I am made of. We can only best learn such things when one is under extreme stress, and that surely is the stage I am in now - physical, psychological, spiritual.
The issue is, as my body changes, as my brain changes due to lack of stress, you have a duty to discern what if my behavior is me, Loving, and what of my behavior is a changed body and nervous system due to chemical, fluid, calorie imalances. Behaviors of mine due to such is not appropriate or fair to ascribe to who I am, what I am, what I've become.
You have a duty to discern as best you can, what is me, what is an altered avatar.
And my avatar is altering very rapidly now.
The issue is, as my body changes, as my brain changes due to lack of stress, you have a duty to discern what if my behavior is me, Loving, and what of my behavior is a changed body and nervous system due to chemical, fluid, calorie imalances. Behaviors of mine due to such is not appropriate or fair to ascribe to who I am, what I am, what I've become.
You have a duty to discern as best you can, what is me, what is an altered avatar.
And my avatar is altering very rapidly now.
From a High School sweetheart: "You have chosen the path of the bodisattva..." (details)
From a breathtakingly bright, creative, talented, kind, giving, trusting, generous friend I was immensely privileged, and sooooooo unworthy, to have as a friend, in high school:
"Things were different then--people had picnics and Spring was a blessed event.
The dogwood trees bloomed and we knew the sweet air was all ours to breathe.
It was probably mid May. Our shirt sleeves were short, the sun was a white ball of light in a chalky blue sky.
Who knew then it would come to this for us all?
Though you have chosen the path of the bodisattva,
This is how I will remember you--a kind, strong, boy-man with teal-colored eyes.
Even then, you held strong opinions with a strong sense of right and wrong.
I admired you and loved the sound of your voice, whether speaking or singing.
When you pass from this world, I think a rainbow will mark the spot where you stood."
"Things were different then--people had picnics and Spring was a blessed event.
The dogwood trees bloomed and we knew the sweet air was all ours to breathe.
It was probably mid May. Our shirt sleeves were short, the sun was a white ball of light in a chalky blue sky.
Who knew then it would come to this for us all?
Though you have chosen the path of the bodisattva,
This is how I will remember you--a kind, strong, boy-man with teal-colored eyes.
Even then, you held strong opinions with a strong sense of right and wrong.
I admired you and loved the sound of your voice, whether speaking or singing.
When you pass from this world, I think a rainbow will mark the spot where you stood."
Napoleon: “Do you know, Fontanes, what astonishes me most in this world? The inability of force to create anything. In the long run the sword is always beaten by the spirit.”
“Do you know, Fontanes, what astonishes me
most in this world? The inability of force to
create anything. In the long run the sword is
always beaten by the spirit.”
From the must read: Peace and Nonviolence Essays [mp3] Guinan - ScanSoft reads
most in this world? The inability of force to
create anything. In the long run the sword is
always beaten by the spirit.”
From the must read: Peace and Nonviolence Essays [mp3] Guinan - ScanSoft reads
A beautiful gift to me from my Sister Blueskywoman Cree
On FB she wrote - Thinking of my friend n Elder brother Loving as he enters his 17th day hunger strike- Creator doesn't see color, he sees the spirit- pls continue to keep him in your prayers. He ended taking liquids as of yesterday- he wages for the future generations as well. Much love to you Elder Loving-
and then she included this video -
I'll not live to see this Divine vision. But with total Joy, and Loving, Passion, and Peace of Heart I give the last full measure of my devotion to make it so, in time - NOW.
I'll not live to see this Divine vision. But with total Joy, and Loving, Passion, and Peace of Heart I give the last full measure of my devotion to make it so, in time - NOW.
nd Jefferson correctly spoke of the need for blood as fertilizer periodically. Unviolent Warriors, Christ-likes, seize the Initiative and supply their own blood, saving the most vulnerable.' Loving
nd Jefferson correctly spoke of the need for blood as fertilizer periodically. Unviolent Warriors, Christ-likes, seize the Initiative and supply their own blood, saving the most vulnerable.' Loving
(detail) UPDATED HANDOUT -Ecocide's Death Fast Day 18, 0 Liquids Day 1 - Updated Handout at the Vigil, Canadian Embassy, 7/24 - Zero Liquids Day 1
Very, very, very few passers by stop, or even notice. We are deadly expert and NOT seeing what we want to NOT see. Remember the scene in Dicken's Christmas Carrol when the Ghost of Christmas Present opens his robes to Want, and Ignorance, "Spirit, please, put them away, I DON'T WANT TO SEE THEM!' 'I thought not,' said the Spirit.
But of the few who do, I silently hand them the handout above, they read silently, thoughfully, puzzling for a while. When they look back to me I cross my forearms over my heart, the sign for Loving, and bow slightly.
Rarely, when they walk away, do I not see them re-reading the flier as they walk, silently, thoughtfully.
(detail) Ecocide's Death Fast Day 18, 0 Liquids Day 1 - Updated Handout at the Vigil, Canadian Embassy, 7/24 - Zero Liquids Day 1
Very, very, very few passers by stop, or even notice. We are deadly expert and NOT seeing what we want to NOT see. Remember the scene in Dicken's Christmas Carrol when the Ghost of Christmas Present opens his robes to Want, and Ignorance, "Spirit, please, put them away, I DON'T WANT TO SEE THEM!' 'I thought not,' said the Spirit.
But of the few who do, I silently hand them the handout above, they read silently, thoughfully, puzzling for a while. When they look back to me I cross my forearms over my heart, the sign for Loving, and bow slightly.
Rarely, when they walk away, do I not see them re-reading the flier as they walk, silently, thoughtfully.
(detail) From a Dear FB Friend: 'I am having a hard time with crying (for you)... HOW CAN I HELP YOU!?!?!?' "I need...
I need zero attention to me. I need people look past me, to where I am
looking, at our next 200 billion. I need 100% attention there, THERE,
ONLY THERE. AS YOU DO UNTOTHE NEXT 200 BILLION MY CHILDREN, YOU DO UNTO
ME. As you do not do unto my next 200 billion children, you do unto
me. I love you
Ecocide's Death Fast Day 18 MY FINAL ESCALATION: It won't be long now - ceased liquids 4pm 4/14. Avatar not happy at all about this - weak, sick.... Joyful, Totally at Peace, Clear, Resolved, Committed, OverJoyed I know my role to do in this. Distraught that we aren't getting off our God Damned Assess to save a Home, Earth, for our next 200 billion children. God Damn us all to Hell. BUT WHAT OF THE CHILDREN?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?' Loving
Ecocide's Death Fast Day 18 MY FINAL ESCALATION: It won't be long now - ceased liquids 4pm 4/14. Avatar not happy at all about this - weak, sick.... Joyful, Totally at Peace, Clear, Resolved, Committed, OverJoyed I know my role to do in this. Distraught that we aren't getting off our God Damned Assess to save a Home, Earth, for our next 200 billion children. God Damn us all to Hell. BUT WHAT OF THE CHILDREN?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?' Loving
4.14.2013
EDF Day 17: My Cree sister sent to her friends - "Pls keep Elder Loving in your prayers...
Blueskywoman wrote: "Pls keep Elder Loving in your prayers, met this
elder on our INM on December 2012 @Canadian Embassy in Washington DC. He
has started another hunger strike for 16 days now n swears to stop any
liquids now. He is on my mind constantly n has cancer as well..he has
always advocated for the environment n our future generations, ..as hard
as this may sound, he needs our support as well. Pls keep him in your
prayers,, ty , for Start Loving"
Coming from a Cree sister this means a particularly great amount to me. I had such great hope that there were still great warriors there, tho I no longer have that hope - all evidence to the conrtrary - their hearts too are Dead - just zombies, like the rest of us. But sister Blueskywoman Cree has been different than most people of any background - kind, reverential of all people, serious of purpose, dutiful, deeply of the Spirit.
It has been a help, and Joyful, for me to know her.
Coming from a Cree sister this means a particularly great amount to me. I had such great hope that there were still great warriors there, tho I no longer have that hope - all evidence to the conrtrary - their hearts too are Dead - just zombies, like the rest of us. But sister Blueskywoman Cree has been different than most people of any background - kind, reverential of all people, serious of purpose, dutiful, deeply of the Spirit.
It has been a help, and Joyful, for me to know her.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)