What do you do?
- Stay with the spouse. Result is three deaths.
- Leave to escape and live. Spouse stays. Already dead.
- Leave to escape and live. Spouse wakes to your absence. Joins you. THREE LIVE.
At the time I conceived of this post (I'm fleshing it out on 10/15) I had a flash of insight that my life was being called for immediately on this campaign right down to the details of how to allow things to terminate within about 4o days.
This was extremely exciting in the same way it would be exciting for any father to see how to rescue his previously doomed children, though it would cost his life.
We face the ultimate horror - eradication of all humanity. This requires the ultimate weapon - ultimate sacrifice.
Duh.
But the other frogs refuse to jump out (only ONE flew over the kukoo's nest)
Become a Weapon of Mass Humanity:
... THEY'LL LOCK YOU UP!!!!!!!! THEY'LL HURT YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!
No my yob man.
MY behavior is my yob.
THEIR behavior is THEIR yob.
This is a land of 300 million yet we hide behind the fantasy that it is a nation of a handful of purported "leaders." The shame and blood is on the hands of we-the-people.
THIS MORNING popped into my mind "UNARMED PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE."
Yes this needs more work, but I think it is on a promising path. Comments?
1. MY FOCUS SHOULD NOT / MUST NOT BE ON MAKING SOME "LEGAL" POINT OR ADVANCE.
2. MY FOCUS SHOULD BE TO OFFER AN OPPORTUNITY FOR MORAL CONVERSION.
3. My efforts should be to be a Brother providing an opportunity to a sibling (judge, onlookers) to "wake up" to their sub-humanity, and move to their birthright - HUMANITY (EMPIRE LICENSES SUB-HUMANITY).
IF I DECIDE THAT THIS OCT 12 COURT APPEARANCE IS WORTH IT:
4. I should take responsibility for how much risk (time in jail) vs opportunity this particular Moral Opportunity presents and decide accordingly how much risk to take. With two weeks to ponder this further, and hoping for input from you, my current, strongly held thought for weeks now is to proceed as outlined above, despite the wonderful input I have received to the contrary so far [take a lawyer, contest that the order was "lawful," cuz it "wasn't; it violates free speech! Will help us correct the legal system....]. Why?
Please tell me your thoughts, if you like; but feel not an ounce of pressure to do so. Start. See Comments below.
ps: Several hours after writing this post I saw Blood Diamond.
This was a major discovery revealed in Tolstoy's The Kingdom of God is Within You (last 2 chapters first), the book that created Gandhi:
What the individual would never do,
gross inhumanity to another,
that same individual
IN THEIR
STATE / EMPIRE /
INSTITUTIONAL / SOCIAL ROLL
WILL ALWAYS DO,
AGAIN, AND AGAIN....